Many believe that living in a city offers greater benefits compared to life in the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over time, changes seen in humankind’s living preferences. Some individuals believe that living in a rural area is not as beneficial as living in town has. I partially agree with the given notion, and my inclination will be justified in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.
To embarking with, numerous reasons indicate living in a city offers greater benefits. First and foremost, people get more amenities than villages. Among the few are considered essential, such as education and health regarding provision. In addition, quality of life standard is also high as well economically beneficial because salary rates are high. For instance, for traveling, a host of transportation modes is in town, which yields time flexibility whereas it’s hard to find transport in some countryside. Secondly, for a living person need to vocation work and in a developed area, more job opportunities available with exceedingly high wages.
On the other hand, undeveloped area life also carries benefits, especially health-related. In rural areas, population or civilization is not much developed, and industries are also less. Thus, the pollution level is low; furthermore, live life in nature is also beneficial for a healthy body. One even claimed that owing to fresh air, nutritional food and away from pollution aid the people who live in the countryside, they live more years than the person who lives in a city.
To end with, some people believe that living life in the suburb has not benefited as in the megacity has. I believe that in-town job opportunity, wages rates and quality of life standards are higher, however, in village pure air and away from advance word’s invention and pollution beneficial for body and health.
Follow us on IELTSTrend Twitter for more updates
Also, Read Competition for University Study Is Becoming Increasingly Strong