Some feel that good entertainers are as important to society as scientists. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the years, it's seen that humankind thoughts and preferences are change. Some individuals believe that the people who entertain are pivotal as scientists. I partially agree with the given notion, and my inclination will be justified in the following paragraphs, along with the logical conclusion.
There are several reasons why I would argue that they are important. First and foremost, In this techno-savvy era, people have a hectic schedule due to their heavy workload and running in a rat race; they take mental stress, which is deleterious for their bodies. Owing to entertainers, they feel relax. For instance, one survey conducted by times of New York in 2016 demonstrates that watching comedy shows and doing entertainment activities health improvement seen in four quarters percentage of citizens. Worldwide a host of people believe that entertainment is the better cure than swallowing medicine.
On the other hand, scientists are also paramount in the community. They risk their own lives in several experiments and spend their whole lives for others; scientists also made people live easy by their invention. In other words, if Thomas hadn’t eager behave, did 999 times experiment to develop the bulb or invented the bulb then currently lights in the night is a scourge. However, the person who studies the material world must have a heap of funds and resources to work on any projects.
In conclusion, some people feel that scientists and entertainers both are in the same category as well as imperative in society. I believe that the person who entertains other help to a healthier life and citizen cherish.
Follow Us on IELTSTrend Twitter
Also, Read Some People Today Prefer to Get Advice for Medical Problems