Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?
A host of scientific research demonstrates that smoking and overeating both are deleterious. As a result, the authority ought to forbid a number of food products advertisement. I partially agree with the given notion; my inclination will be justified in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.
There are several reasons why I believe that promoting such kinds of food should have to be banned. First and foremost, due to western cultural influence, many citizens eat spicy food made by those ingredients that are harmful to the human body. For instance, one survey conducted by the Times of India illustrates that eating restaurant meals for a long term myriad of people suffering from health problems and obesity tribulation. Secondly, we all know that to show others and status a number of individuals eat junk food. In other words, for competition, overeating is common in numerous cities.
Cigarette and overeating both are detrimental, although, letter on can control by a person despite promoted items effect. Advertise in the way of manufacturing companies to promote products as well as a source of income. In addition, numerous family foreheads whole for it and their families are run by it, such as the worker who makes shoots possible.
In conclusion, it is true that eating more than required is detrimental as smoking; therefore, the bureaucrats have to ban some meals promotion. I believe that despite promotion advantages and some people wages, this has to restrict.
Follow Us on IELTSTrend Twitter
Also, Read Some People Today Prefer to Get Advice for Medical Problems
Leave a Reply