Without capital punishment (the death penalty), our lives are less secure, and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The oldest method to deal with criminals is to penalize them to death is mainly preferred by many. However, harsh punishment is not at all required in all cases of violence. I partially agree with the given notion as death penalization leads to saving innocent residents and also reduce the rate of criminal activities.
The first and foremost reason for continuing death punishment is to save the natives of the motherland from smugglers, murders and also terrorists in order to maintain Harmony as they would never discontinue the bad habits irrespective of any effort made by the government. Consequently, hanging them would be an effective method to maintain peace and make a crime-free nation which is the need of the hour.
Additionally, criminal activities would be reduced only by the threat of damnation among culprits. With this, lawbreakers will think twice before committing any unlawful work. Therefore, the rate of burglary, robbery, theft, like violence would retrench and save many lives. For instance, Dubai is one of the countries where offenders are given capital punishment to curb the root of violence and leniency is not entertained by officials.
Nevertheless, some sceptics and advocates do not concur with the same side. They believe that incarcerating delinquents would be a better option to minimize illegitimate undertakings. As a result, civilians would understand the social emotions when they do voluntary work behind bars. For instance, frauds, disorderly conduct or property crimes are such unlawful work that can be reduced by sending them to jail.
To conclude, despite any other way of punishing, capital punishment result to end the life of culprits to maintain peace and also to save the innocent lives of humankind is a better method.
Follow Us on IELTSTrend Twitter
Leave a Reply