Big companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the provision and life standard of humankind has been increased over the year. Several individuals believe that big organizations ought to yield some funds to improve sports and other facilities for local people. I firmly disagree with the given notion, and my inclination will be justified in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.
There are several reasons why I would argue against this statement. The primary reason behind this is that this is the authority responsibility. The person in the street pay various taxes to the bureaucrats; they provide the amenities and work to improve their lifestyle. In other words, if famous or household companies do this work, the chance to have bad consequences such as people stop paying taxes and be unfaithful towards the elected party. However, distribute some proportion of profit to the penurious family would be great.
Furthermore, rather than working on social works, big companies can opt for another way. Industries are the backbone of any nation; they not only contribute to the national economy. However, they also yield job opportunities and work for a plethora of people. Hence, if one organization is well established and becomes big, they have to aid other small companies. These organizations are ideal for small or developing companies as well, as if they become big, then it also forges full employment opportunities.
In conclusion, for the local community, mega-companies have to allocate fund and resources although, I believe that there can do other work and this is primarily government priority to providing facilities.
Follow Us on IELTSTrend Twitter