In the future, it’s expected that the proportion of older people is higher than younger people… Its positive or negative development.
It is true that humankind could not change a host of natural processing things. Several individuals believe that golden-ager proportion will be higher than a young generation in future. In this essay, I will examine which types of advancement is in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.
There are numerous reasons that indicate this is negative development in terms of medical expenses and the economy. First and foremost, we all know that the bureaucrats yield health provision or insurance and pension to retire people. If their proportion is high, then most government funds are used on it; hence, it blocks another improvement that is pivotal for any nation's growth. Secondly, after turning 60, most people struggle with some deleterious illnesses such as high blood pressure and diabetes. Moreover, owing to low physical strength, they cannot work long hours, which directly affects the economy of any territory.
However, senior citizens also beings a few positive sides. They have the majority of the experience, so they can guide or mentor inexperienced people and aid them. In addition, young ager can learn moral values of life and other many essential lessons. Furthermore, in this contemporary era, the majority of youngsters do not want to do low profile jobs and are not cooperative with old-ager; however, this age group can replace them, and they can do it like security guards.
In conclusion, if young people number will lower than older then for bureaucrats and family, it carries economically burden whereas for the community and inexperienced people it is positive.
Follow Us on IELTSTrend Twitter